Our page on Facebook with over 2 million followers was deleted. Follow the new page here: Physics-Astronomy.com Facebook Page

default | grid-3 | grid-2

Post per Page

The 2 Most Dangerous Numbers in the Universe Could Signal the End of Physics

An extremely troubling and controversial line of thinking has arose in the physics community. It’s the notion that we are getting closer the absolute limit of what we can comprehend about the world around us through science. A particle physicist, Harry Cliff, CERN said during a recent TED talk in Geneva, Switzerland “The next few years may tell us whether we’ll be able to continue to increase our understanding of nature or whether maybe, for the first time in the history of science, we could be facing questions that we cannot answer” Just as frightening is the reason for this imminent limit, which according to Cliff is: "Because the laws of physics forbid it."

First Dangerous Number “The strength of the Higgs field”: According to Cliff,the first dangerous number is a value that signifies the power of what physicists call the Higgs field, an unseen energy field not completely unlike other magnetic fields that permeates the cosmos. As particles plunge through the Higgs field, they get mass to ultimately become the protons, neutrons, or covering all of the atoms that make everything around us. Without Higgs field it, we wouldn’t be here.

There is no doubt about the existence of Higgs field. And there’s something about the Higgs field that remains unresolvable and continue to worry physicists like Cliff.

According to general relativity and the theory of quantum, the Higgs field should be carrying out one of two tasks, says Cliff. Either it should be turned off or turned on. If turned off, it should have a strength value of zero and automatically giving no mass to particles. If turned on, as the theory goes, this 'on value' is "completely enormous. But what physicists observe back in 2012 does not match with neither of those two scenarios.

As Cliff says "In reality, the Higgs field is just slightly on. It’s not zero, but it’s ten thousand trillion times weaker than its fully on value - a bit like a light switch that got stuck just before the 'off' position. And this value is crucial. If it were a tiny bit different, then there would be no physical structure in the Universe."

There is still no explanation about why the strength of the Higgs field is so extremely weak, Physicists hope to find some positive results from newly-upgraded particle accelerator at CERN. As for now, they’re still hunting.

Second Dangerous Number “The strength of dark energy”: The second dangerous number is what physicists have called “the worst theoretical prediction in the history of physics

Dark energy, a repulsive force that’s accountable for the accelerating growth of our Universe, was first measured in 1998. Nobody knows what dark energy is, but several physicist including Cliff think that it’s the energy of empty space itself or the energy of the vacuum itself.

If this turn outs to be the truth, we should be able to sum up all the energy of empty space to get a number signifying the power of dark energy. And even though theoretical physicists have tried, there’s one massive problem with their answer: 

Cliff said "Dark energy should be 10120  times stronger than the value we observe from astronomy. This is a number so mind-boggling huge that it’s impossible to get your head around … this number is bigger than any number in astronomy - it’s a thousand trillion trillion trillion times bigger than the number of atoms in the Universe. That’s a pretty bad prediction."

On the good side, we’re quite lucky that dark energy is lesser than theorists predict. If it followed our theoretical concepts, then the repulsive force of dark energy would be so enormous that it would literally rip our Universe apart. The essential forces that keep atoms together would be completely ineffective against it and galaxies, stars, planets, and life as we know it would not exist.

Physicists can’t use the present theories of the Universe to pbtain a better measurement of dark energy that settles with current observations. Even better than improving our concepts would be to find a way that we can understand why the strength of dark energy and the Higgs field is what it is.


Mettalchic said...

Dark energy and dark matter are place holder terms, that have been confused to be otherwise. In reality Dark Matter and Dark energy are "Unknown energy and Unknown matter"

beat said...

So yes, the Higgs scalar presents us with the hierarchy problem. To me, any attempt to extrapolate from known physics to the Planck scale seems very, very bold (I probably fail to understand something here), and that factor of 10^120 - my guess is that it just tells us that we have not understood a fundamental point.
I also worry about the future of high energy particle physics given the LHC results. But I would caution against "extremely troubling absolute limits" of what we will "ever" be able to find out about "the universe". So far, every new collider energy scale has brought new particles- and suddenly, after the Higgs, there should be 30 orders of magnitude with no new physics?
Finally, the Euclid telescope (as I understand) will let us have a glimpse at the state equation of dark energy. So there's still new things to find out. Let's not be too pessimistic about what future generations of researchers are able to discover!

Error Page Image

Error Page Image

Oooops.... Could not find it!!!

The page you were looking for, could not be found. You may have typed the address incorrectly or you may have used an outdated link.

Go to Homepage