In 1917, just after Albert
Einstein’s general theory of relativity was issued—but quiet two years earlier
he would turn out to be a worldwide personality as we know— Albert Einstein
elected to tackle not only the origin but the whole universe. For anybody else,
this might appear a remarkably ambitious and difficult task, but this was THE
ALBERT EINSTEIN. Albert Einstein initiated his
study of understanding the whole universe by relating his field equations of
gravitation to what he considered to be the whole universe. The field equations
extended Newton’s theory of gravity to realms where speeds approach that of
light and masses are incredibly very huge. One important point to be noted here
is, his math was well improved than he desired to trust. In other words his
equations expressed that the universe could not stay fixed: it had to either
expand or contract under all circumstances. Einstein elected to ignore what his
math was telling him.

The Irish physicist Cormac
O’Raifeartaigh was checking papers at the Einstein Archives at the Hebrew
University in Jerusalem in late 2013 when he discovered a handwritten document
by Einstein that researchers had never considered wisely before. The discovered
paper, named “Zum kosmologischen Problem” (“About the Cosmological Problem”),
had been mistakenly placed as a draft of extra paper, which was published by Albert
Einstein in 1931 in the records of the Prussian Academy of Sciences. This paper
was actually his determined effort to resurrect the cosmological constant which
he had vowed not ever to use for a second time.

In a paper just filed on the
electronic physics source ArXiv, O’Raifeartaigh and coworkers display that in
the initial 1930s (the supposed date is 1931, but this is unclear), Albert Einstein
was still trying to return to his analysis of 1917 of a universe with a
cosmological constant. Albert Einstein composed (the authors’ transformation
from the German): “This difficulty [the
inconsistency of the laws of gravity with a finite mean density of matter] also
arises in the general theory of relativity. However, I have shown that this can
be overcome through the introduction of the so-called “λ–term” to the field
equations… I showed that these equations can be satisfied by a spherical space
of constant radius over time, in which matter has a density ρ that is constant
over space and time.” But Albert Einstein was now attentive
of Hubble’s discovery of the expansion of the universe: “On the other hand, Hubbel’s
[sic*] exceedingly important investigations have shown that the extragalactic
nebulae have the following two properties 1) Within the bounds of observational
accuracy they are uniformly distributed in space 2) They possess a Doppler
effect proportional to their distance”

And so Albert Einstein suggested
a review of his model, still with a cosmological constant, but at that time the
constant was liable for the conception of new matter as the universe expanded (that’s
because Albert Einstein assumed that in an expanding universe, the whole concentration
of matter had to still stay constant): “In what follows, I would like
to draw attention to a solution to equation (1) that can account for Hubbel’s
facts, and in which the density is constant over time.” And: “If one considers
a physically bounded volume, particles of matter will be continually leaving
it. For the density to remain constant, new particles of matter must be
continually formed in the volume from space.” Albert Einstein attains this
property by the use of his old cosmological constant, λ (lambda): “The conservation law is
preserved in that by setting the λ-term, space itself is not empty of energy;
as is well-known its validity is guaranteed by equations (1).” So Albert Einstein hang onto
using his rejected lambda, even though he invented it for a non-expanding
universe. If the universe expands as presented by Hubble, Albert Einstein appears
to be saying, then I still want my lambda—now to preserve the universe from
becoming less dense as it enlarges in volume.

Nearly
two decades later, a related “steady state” universe would be offered by Hermann
Bondi, Fred Hoyle and Tommy Gold, in papers distributed in 1949. But these
published models of the universe are not supported by modern theories. A theory
of modern cosmology is that as the universe will expand a great deal (after an unbelievably
lengthy period of time), it will convert into very thinly occupied, reasonably
than dense, with lost photons and electrons whooshing alone through huge areas
of vacuum.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

*It’s exciting that Einstein
constantly misspells the name of Edwin Hubble (“Hubbel”). Had he not yet met
Hubble in person? Well we don’t know. The spelling mistake does point at the statement
that Hubble’s discovery was not yet so intensely recognized so that his name
would be well known by all researchers.

**This blog is managed by Umer Abrar. To contact the editor, write to mirzavadoodulbaig@gmail.com or follow him on facebook here:**